Sanskritik Rashtravad

Category: Articles

  • Trump and Modi Come Back: A New Era or End of a Chapter?

    Reflecting on their relationship, PM Modi expressed his anticipation for future collaboration:

    “As you build on the successes of your previous term, I look forward to renewing our collaboration to further strengthen the India-US Comprehensive Global and Strategic Partnership”

    *Michael Kugelman, South Asia Director at the Wilson Center: “Trump’s victory means that the Indian policies that have put New Delhi at odds with the West will no longer be a cause of concern for Washington”

    **Uday Chandra, South Asia and Foreign Policy Expert: “He is a refreshing reset from the Indian perspective… he is much more transactional”

    //////////////

    “Hearty congratulations to my friend @realDonaldTrump on your historic electoral victory” Prime Minister Narendra Modi

    Reflecting on their relationship, Prime Minister Modi expressed his hope for future cooperation: “As you build on the successes of your past tenure, I look forward to renewing our cooperation to further strengthen the India-US comprehensive global and strategic partnership”

    Trump-Modi Relationship: A Historical Context:

    The friendship between Donald Trump and Narendra Modi has been characterized by mutual understanding and shared goals since their earliest meetings. Their rapport was publicly demonstrated during events such as “Howdy Modi” in Houston and “Namaste Trump” in Ahmedabad, symbolizing the deepening of ties between the world’s largest democracies. Trump’s first term saw significant cooperation on various fronts, including defense, trade, and counterterrorism, setting a precedent for future cooperation.

    Donald Trump’s return to the White House and Narendra Modi’s continued leadership in India is a pivotal moment in global politics. Their relationship, characterised by mutual admiration and strategic alignment, has the potential to reshape international relations. Here is a detailed look at what this return means for the two leaders and their countries.

    The return of Donald Trump and Narendra Modi to influential positions has triggered a wave of global analysis. Many see it as the beginning of a new era marked by the resurgence of populist politics, while some argue that it may signal the beginning of the end for their brand of leadership. Both leaders, known for their strong, nationalistic rhetoric, are facing familiar and new challenges. This chapter explores what their return means for domestic politics, international relations and the broader global order.

    Confusion

    Donald Trump’s recent return to the presidency has given rise to significant discussion about its implications for global politics, particularly with regard to India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. As the two leaders prepare to begin a new chapter in their countries’ bilateral relations, the question arises: is this a new era or simply the end of a chapter?

    1. **Personal rapport and political chemistry**

    The personal rapport between Trump and Modi has been the cornerstone of their relationship. Their friendship was evident during events such as “Howdy Modi!” in Houston and “Namaste Trump” in Ahmedabad. Trump once called Modi a “fantastic person” and a “true friend”. This personal chemistry is expected to play a key role in his second term, leading to closer ties between the US and India.

    2. ** Strategic alignment**

    The two leaders share a vision of economic nationalism and strategic autonomy. Trump’s “America First” policy meshes well with Modi’s “Make in India” initiative. This alignment is likely to strengthen economic and defence cooperation. The Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) signed during his previous tenure is testimony to his commitment to enhance military cooperation.

    3. **Domestic Politics: Return to familiar territory**

    Both Trump and Modi are charismatic individuals who have relied heavily on populist strategies to attract their domestic audiences. His return shows that his core messages continue to resonate with large segments of his population.

    **Trump’s Return**

    Trump’s victory represents a reaffirmation of his “America First” agenda. In his previous term, he focused on deregulation, tax cuts, and an outspoken stance on immigration, which garnered a devoted base. Those same supporters see his return as an opportunity to continue unfinished work, particularly on issues of border security, economic nationalism, and cultural conservatism. However, critics argue that his divisive rhetoric and controversial policies are a step backward for American unity.

    *”The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no more,”* Trump famously said during his first victory speech, a line that defined his second rise to power.

    **Modi’s Leadership in India**

    Modi’s return to India is also a sign of the enduring power of his leadership style. His tenure has been marked by a strong Hindu nationalist narrative, significant economic reforms, and an emphasis on India’s global stature. Modi’s policies, such as demonetisation and the goods and services tax (GST), have faced both praise and criticism. Still, his ability to connect with the grassroots through programmes such as “Swachh Bharat” (Clean India) and his focus on digitalisation have ensured a loyal support base.

    *”Modi’s politics is about emotions, and he knows how to speak to the common Indian,”* says Pratap Bhanu Mehta, a noted Indian political scientist

    4. **Economic Policies: Continuity or Change**

    Economic Cooperation and Trade Challenges: While the economic partnership between the US and India is likely to grow, challenges remain. Trump’s protectionist stance and his emphasis on fair trade could create tensions. During his first term, Trump dubbed India a “tariff king” and imposed tariffs on many Indian goods. Modi’s government will have to deal with these challenges to maintain strong economic ties.

    For both Trump and Modi, economic strategies are key to their political brands. Their economic philosophies focus on self-reliance and prioritizing national industries, but there are significant differences in execution.

    **Trump’s Economic Approach**

    Trump is expected to pursue policies aimed at reducing reliance on global supply chains, promoting domestic manufacturing, and revisiting trade deals such as the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement). His stance on tariffs, especially with China, is likely to remain tough, seeing it as a means to protect American jobs and intellectual property.

    *”Tariffs are the best!”* Trump once tweeted, summarizing his strategy to pressure foreign competitors and encourage local businesses.

    Economic Policies: Continuity or Change : Economic Cooperation and Trade Challenges: While the economic partnership between the U.S. and India is poised to grow, challenges remain. Trump’s protectionist stance and his emphasis on fair trade could lead to tensions. During his first term, Trump labeled India the “tariff king” and imposed tariffs on several Indian goods. Modi’s government will need to navigate these challenges to maintain a robust economic relationship.

    For both Trump and Modi, economic strategies are crucial to their political brands. Their economic philosophies focus on self-reliance and prioritizing national industries, but with significant differences in execution.

    **Trump’s Economic Vision** 

    Expect Trump to push forward with policies aimed at reducing dependence on global supply chains, bolstering domestic manufacturing, and revisiting trade deals like the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement). His stance on tariffs, particularly regarding China, is likely to remain tough, viewing it as a means to protect American jobs and intellectual property.

    *”Tariffs are the greatest!”* Trump once tweeted, encapsulating his strategy to pressure foreign competitors and incentivize local businesses.

    **Modi’s ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ (Self-Reliant India)** 

    Modi’s comeback will likely involve reinforcing his “Atmanirbhar Bharat” initiative, aimed at reducing India’s dependence on foreign goods and boosting indigenous industries. Modi’s vision aligns with bolstering sectors like defense manufacturing, agriculture, and technology, emphasizing a push for India to become a global production hub. However, challenges like unemployment, agrarian distress, and social disparities may complicate this vision.

    Economic Cooperation and Trade Challenges: While the economic partnership between the US and India is likely to grow, challenges remain. Trump’s protectionist stance and his emphasis on fair trade could cause tensions. During his first term, Trump dubbed India the “tariff king” and imposed tariffs on many Indian goods.

    Modi’s government will have to address these challenges to maintain strong economic ties.

    Economic Policies and Strategic Interests: Both leaders advocate business innovation and economic growth, which could lead to transformational change on the global economic stage. Trump’s “America First” policy is in line with Modi’s aspirations to make India the third-largest economy globally. As a recent analysis noted, “Under his leadership, India and the US could potentially make significant inroads on the global economic stage”

    This alignment suggests that their new partnership could enhance economic ties as well as address shared challenges, such as balancing China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

    Challenges ahead

    However, Trump’s return also brings challenges that need to be handled carefully. His protectionist trade policies could clash with India’s economic interests, requiring Modi to balance diplomatic engagement with national priorities. Analysts have pointed out that India must “balance economic optimism with caution” as it pursues its ties with the unpredictable partner.

    5.**Foreign Policy: Nationalism on the Global Stage**

    Both leaders have shown a keen interest in reshaping foreign policy to reflect nationalist priorities, impacting alliances, trade, and global diplomacy.

    **Trump’s America First: The Sequel** 

    Trump’s foreign policy is expected to focus on reinforcing American sovereignty, a theme that dominated his previous administration. His approach to alliances, often transactional, could see NATO allies urged to increase defense spending and trade relationships revisited with a critical eye. Trump’s stance on China will likely remain combative, emphasizing economic decoupling and competition in technology and military power.

    *”The world is laughing at us,”* Trump has said about previous administrations’ foreign policies, reflecting his determination to project strength and renegotiate from a position of power.

    **Modi’s Global Ambitions** 

    For Modi, foreign policy centers around enhancing India’s image as a global leader while balancing ties with major powers like the U.S., Russia, and China. Modi’s emphasis on strategic autonomy, evident in India’s neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, will likely continue. His diplomatic approach, often termed “Modi Doctrine,” seeks to project India as a mediator and a responsible global player, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region.

    *”India’s time has come,”* Modi declared at a recent BRICS summit, underscoring his vision of India’s rising influence.

    6. **Social and Cultural Landscape: Divisive Narratives?**

    The returns of Trump and Modi are also a commentary on the cultural and social divides that have deepened in their respective countries.

    Cultural and Community Ties

    Culturally, the Indian diaspora in the United States has played an essential role in shaping perceptions and policies toward India. The strong support from this community during Trump’s campaign indicates that he may prioritize issues relevant to Indian Americans, including concerns over rising Hinduphobia and Khalistani activism in North America. The Modi-Trump camaraderie could provide a platform for addressing these issues effectively.

    *Trump’s Cultural Battles**

    Trump’s rhetoric often polarizes the American electorate along ideological lines, emphasizing conservative values, religious freedom, and traditional social norms. His return has renewed debates on topics like critical race theory, immigration, and identity politics, which resonate strongly with his base but alienate liberal and moderate voters.

    **Modi’s Hindutva Agenda** 

    Modi’s leadership has seen a rise in Hindu nationalism, with policies that critics argue marginalize minorities, especially Muslims. The revocation of Article 370 in Kashmir and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) have been viewed as attempts to reshape India’s secular fabric. Supporters, however, praise Modi for taking bold steps that they believe uphold India’s cultural heritage.

    *”Our cultural values are our strength,”* Modi often states, aligning his policies with India’s ancient traditions.

    7. **Challenges and Criticisms: Learning from the Past**

    The return of both leaders is not without significant challenges. Each faces skepticism and a more informed and critical opposition.

    **Trump’s Legal Troubles and Public Perception** 

    Trump’s return is clouded by ongoing legal battles and investigations into his past conduct. These controversies could undermine his authority, even as they reinforce his narrative of being a victim of the “deep state.” Additionally, his unorthodox style, while appealing to a core group of supporters, has alienated many within his own party.

    **Modi’s Economic and Social Hurdles** 

    In India, Modi’s comeback may be overshadowed by concerns about economic inequalities, religious tensions, and a slowing job market. His economic policies, though ambitious, have had mixed outcomes, leading some to question the sustainability of his development model.

    4. Defense and Security Collaboration

    Defense cooperation is expected to be a significant focus. The U.S. and India have conducted joint military exercises and signed key defense agreements. Trump’s support for India’s defense capabilities, including potential technology transfers, will be crucial in countering regional threats, particularly from China.

    5. Geopolitical Implications

    Trump’s return could have profound geopolitical implications. His non-interventionist approach and focus on bilateral relations may lead to a recalibration of U.S. foreign policy. Modi, on the other hand, seeks to position India as a counterbalance to China in the Indo-Pacific region. Their combined efforts could reshape the strategic landscape of the region.

    Geopolitical Dynamics: The geopolitical landscape has shifted considerably since Trump’s first term. With growing tensions involving China and Russia, India stands to benefit from a strong US partnership. Trump’s administration is expected to maintain a firm stance against China, which aligns with India’s strategic interests. This partnership could provide India with enhanced support in areas such as defense and intelligence-sharing, crucial for asserting its territorial claims. Moreover, Trump’s approach towards Pakistan regarding Kashmir may lead to increased international pressure on Islamabad, further solidifying India’s position on this contentious issue. As one expert noted, “Trump’s support for India could translate into even greater international pressure on Pakistan”

    6. Human Rights and Democratic Values

    One area of potential friction is human rights. Modi’s government has faced criticism for its handling of minority rights and democratic backsliding. While the Biden administration raised these issues, Trump is less likely to do so, focusing instead on strategic and economic interests. This could lead to a more pragmatic, albeit controversial, partnership.

    7. Technology and Innovation

    Both leaders have emphasized the importance of technology and innovation. The U.S. and India are likely to collaborate on various technological fronts, including cybersecurity, space exploration, and digital infrastructure. This collaboration could drive significant advancements and economic growth in both countries.

    8. Immigration and Skilled Workforce

    Immigration policies could be another area of contention. Trump’s stringent immigration policies, particularly regarding H1-B visas, have impacted Indian professionals. Modi’s government will need to advocate for more favorable immigration policies to support the Indian diaspora in the U.S.

    9. Climate Change and Environmental Policies

    Climate change is a critical global issue, but it may not be a priority for Trump. Modi, however, has committed to various environmental initiatives. Balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability will be a challenge for both leaders,

    10. Future Prospects and Challenges

    The future of Trump-Modi relations will depend on their ability to navigate these complex issues. Their shared vision and strategic alignment offer significant opportunities, but potential challenges could strain their partnership. As they embark on this new era, the world will be watching closely to see if their comeback marks a new chapter or the end of an era.

    ### 6. **A New Era or the End of a Chapter?**

    The question remains: does the return of Trump and Modi signal a new era of populist consolidation, or is it the beginning of the end for their style of governance?

    **A New Era of Populism?** 

    Their resurgence can be seen as proof that nationalist and populist movements are not merely political trends but enduring forces that respond to real and perceived grievances of the masses. In an era of increasing polarization, their leadership styles—characterized by direct communication, strong personalities, and the promise to break with traditional politics—appeal to those disillusioned with the establishment.

    **End of a Chapter?** 

    Conversely, others argue that their comebacks might highlight the limitations of populism. Critics suggest that their style of governance, heavy on symbolism and rhetoric, often lacks the institutional support needed for sustainable long-term changes. Economic challenges, social polarization, and diplomatic complexities could expose the limits of their approaches.

    **Conclusion** 

    The return of Donald Trump and Narendra Modi reflects a significant moment in global politics, indicating both the persistence of populist narratives and the challenges that come with them. Whether this marks a new era of political dominance or the final act of a unique political chapter will depend largely on their ability to adapt, deliver, and respond to the evolving expectations of their electorates and the global community. As they navigate these uncertainties, the world watches closely, assessing whether their brand of leadership will redefine the future or be relegated to the past.

    The return of Trump and the continued leadership of Modi herald a new era in U.S.-India relations. Their personal rapport, strategic alignment, and shared vision for economic nationalism present significant opportunities for collaboration. However, challenges in trade, human rights, and immigration policies could test their partnership. As they navigate these complexities, their ability to adapt and cooperate will determine whether this marks a new beginning or the end of a chapter in their political journey.

    As Trump embarks on his second term, it is evident that both he and Modi share a vision for strengthening bilateral ties based on mutual interests. Their relationship has weathered various global challenges, indicating resilience that could define this new era. However, whether this partnership will lead to substantial advancements or merely reflect past dynamics remains uncertain. The world will be watching closely as they navigate trade agreements, defense collaborations, and regional stability initiatives.

    While there are promising signs of a strengthened alliance between Trump and Modi that could herald a new era in India-US relations, significant challenges require careful diplomacy and strategic foresight. The upcoming months will be critical in determining whether this relationship can evolve beyond previous frameworks or if it will simply reiterate established patterns from their first term together.

  • French President Emmanuel Macron has shot himself in the foot to hug leftists and Islamists

    French President Emmanuel Macron has shot himself in the foot to hug leftists and Islamists

    Macron’s gamble – to expand his coalition or allow the far-right to govern and undermine Marine Le Pen’s chances of winning in 2027 – has failed miserably.

    Now France enters coalition-building phase as revived left and Islamist dominate hung parliament.

    Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader of France Unbowed (LFI) and a former presidential candidate, leads the largest group in the NFP, and is also the least preferred candidate among his coalition partners. It is unclear what kind of coalition Macron will be able to put together. The New Popular Front (NFP) is a broad and fragile electoral alliance of four parties, with no agreed leader and no shared programme. It will struggle to work with Macron.

    French voters, through a historic mobilisation, may have successfully pushed back the threat of the far-right and reduced its momentum for 2027.

    The National Rally (RN) has never been so close to the gates of power. After the first round of the election a week ago, Marine Le Pen’s 28-year-old protege Jordan Bardella was being talked up as Emmanuel Macron’s future prime minister. To everyone’s surprise, everything was reversed between the two rounds.

    The National Assembly is unreformable, divided into three almost equal blocs that are more hostile to each other than ever, and none of which are in a position to impose themselves.

    Emmanuel Macron will undoubtedly argue that he won his electoral gamble. But he hasn’t won – he has lost his political power. The centre of gravity has shifted from the Elysee palace to the National Assembly, which is now in gridlock and can no longer be re-elected for a year.

    There are no winners. The RN may have doubled its seats; it did not win the majority that was within its grasp. The president’s centrist coalition may not have disappeared, but it has lost its relative majority. The New Popular Front, made up of a motley coalition of left-wing parties, certainly came out on top, but it has no leader, no majority and no common purpose.

    The new National Assembly will have three large blocs – none of which comes near the 289 seats needed for an overall majority. While the success of the four-party left coalition, which has become the largest parliamentary group with 182 seats, may worry markets, it has no chance of forming a government and may be increasingly divided between its most radical component, Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s France Unbowed (LFI), and the more moderate Socialists, Greens and Communists.

    It will take many days and perhaps many weeks for a new government to be formed in France. Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN) did not win the election, but it has increased its seats in the National Assembly by 60% since 2022. The far right has not gone away.

    Ironically, Macron is responsible for creating this situation. He broke away from the Socialist Party in 2016 to launch a new centrist movement (now called Renaissance). This transformed the traditional bipolarised party system, destroying the centre-right Les Républicains and creating more space on the extreme right for Marine Le Pen’s party to grow – which it has done clearly in this election, with its number of MPs increasing from 89 to 143. Le Pen’s aspirations for a third shot at the presidency in 2027 remain on track.

  • ‘Balakbuddhi’s intellect is high: Khatakhat’ cash transfer.. Vs Hathras tragedy-Compensation is very inadequate

    ‘Balakbuddhi’s intellect is high: Khatakhat’ cash transfer.. Vs Hathras tragedy-Compensation is very inadequate

    Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has penned a letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister @myogiadityanath urging for increased compensation and immediate assistance for the families of victims in the aftermath of the #Hathrasstampede which claimed the lives of over 120 people.
    @PMOIndia @narendramodi and the Uttar Pradesh government had announced a combined compensation of Rs 4 lakhs for the bereaved families on Friday, with each contributing Rs 2 lakhs.

    Vs

    A Delhi-based lawyer wrote to President Droupadi Murmu seeking disqualification of 99 newly elected Congress MPs for committing an offence under Section 123(1) of the Representation of People Act (RPA), 1951, saying the party’s #khatakhat cash transfer promise amounted to gross corrupt practices as it was aimed at bribing voters.

    “For the last few days the entire media was flooded with #videos of thousands of females who stated that the members of Indian National Congress Party gave this signed Guarantee Card to them and told them that Sh. Rahul Gandhi and Congress Party would deposit Rs. 8500 per month immediately after 4th June,” the representation read.

    Congress Pary of #balakbuddhi Rahul Gandhi is power in #Himachal #Karnatak #Telangana…

  • ‘Balak Buddhi’ Rahul Gandhi met fake loco pilots ?

    ‘Balak Buddhi’ Rahul Gandhi met fake loco pilots ?

    Congress leader ‘Balak Buddhi’ Rahul Gandhi met 50 loco pilots at New Delhi Railway Station on July 05, 2024. After which a Northern Railway official has now claimed that he had met fake pilots.

    Befor this yesterday Rahul Gandhi defamed martyred Agniveers

    Not only this, Balak Buddhi Rahul Gandhi  has claimed that Rahul Gandhi came with 8 camera persons. Deepak has also shared a video on social media. In which it was claimed that Rahul Gandhi had brought some cameramen for his reel. It looked as if a film shooting was going on. After this claim of the railway officer, BJP has started attacking Rahul Gandhi.

    BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya shared the video on Twitter and said that it seems that Rahul Gandhi, who failed for the third time, went to meet the loco pilots in the afternoon. He was accompanied by eight cameramen and a director. You can count them yourself. The interesting thing is that he did not meet the real loco pilots. He quipped that there is every possibility that they were professional actors, who were called by his team.

    https://twitter.com/amitmalviya/status/1809298631955988797?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1809298631955988797%7Ctwgr%5Eaf1f203ff65ad578cc6da0f1db2fd3b5cdb5889f%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.performindia.com%2Frahul-gandhi-loco-pilots-reel-meet-at-new-delhi-railway-station%2F

    Rahul Gandhi after the meeting

    Let us tell you that Rahul Gandhi had also shared a post after meeting the loco pilots. In which he told that he had met 50 loco pilots from all over the country. He said that these loco pilots have the responsibility of thousands of passengers every day. But still they are forced to work without complete rest and respect. Attacking the government, he said that the backbone of transport in the country has become a victim of the government’s injustice. He talked to everyone and assured to en

  • Rahul Gandhi became Hitlerian Goebbels by defaming the army and martyred Agniveers

    Rahul Gandhi became Hitlerian Goebbels by defaming the army and martyred Agniveers

    Congress leader and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi is continuously spreading lies on Agniveer to defame the Indian Army and the Modi government. While discussing the motion of thanks on the President’s address, he raised the Agniveer issue and poisoned the society. On July 1, Rahul Gandhi lied on Agniveer in Parliament. At that time, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh had interrupted him and exposed Rahul Gandhi’s lie in the Parliament itself, but Rahul Gandhi, who was determined to set the country on fire, again made a video on Agniveer on July 3 to mislead the youth of the country. After this, the Army came forward and exposed Rahul’s lie. The Army said that Rs 98.39 lakh has been given to the family. The Army said in its clarification that the total amount would be around Rs 1.65 crore. At the same time, the family of the martyred Agniveer also said that it has received compensation. Even after this, Rahul Gandhi’s continuous lying on this issue should come under the category of treason. Here the question also arises that does he want to create rebellion among the Agniveers of the country? It appears that Rahul Gandhi wants to defame the Modi government by throwing the country into chaos so as to deter foreign investors from coming to India.

    Does Congress defame the army because of its secret agreement with China?

    Rahul Gandhi again spreads lies on Agniveer
    After speaking in Parliament on July 1, Rahul Gandhi again spread lies on Agniveer by posting a video on Twitter on July 3. He tweeted – “Protection of truth is the basis of every religion! But Defense Minister Rajnath Singh lied in Parliament about the assistance given to the family of martyr Agniveer. Martyr Agniveer Ajay Singh’s father himself has told the truth about his lie. Defense Minister should apologize to Parliament, the country, the army and the family of martyr Agniveer Ajay Singh ji.” From the video posted with the tweet, it seems that Congress has relaunched Rahul Gandhi again.

    Army exposes Rahul Gandhi’s lie
    Army has now exposed Rahul Gandhi’s lie on Agniveer. The Army wrote in a post on Twitter that “Some social media posts have claimed that the family of Agniveer Ajay Kumar, who lost his life in the line of duty, has not been compensated. Such claims are completely baseless. The Indian Army salutes the supreme sacrifice of Agniveer Ajay Kumar. He was cremated with full military honours. Out of the total amount payable, Rs 98.39 lakh has already been paid to the family of Agniveer Ajay.”

    Proof of the amount given to Agniveer Ajay
    Documentary evidence of fund transfer to Agniveer Ajay Kumar. Insurance company paid Rs 48 lakh on 10 June 24. Similarly, Rs 50 lakh of DSP insurance i.e. non-contributory insurance was given on 13 February 24. This is proof that the army is speaking the truth. Rahul Gandhi wants to make political gains by lying to bury the Congress party’s frustration of being out of power for 10 years. But now his lies have been exposed.

    Defense Minister exposed Rahul’s lies in Parliament
    Defense Minister Rajnath Singh strongly objected to Rahul Gandhi’s statement on Agniveer Yojana in the Lok Sabha. Defense Minister Rajnath Singh accused Rahul Gandhi of misleading the Lok Sabha by giving wrong statements. Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said, “Rahul Gandhi should not try to mislead the House by giving wrong statements. He further said, “If any of our Agniveer soldiers is martyred during the war or while protecting the country, then an amount of Rs 1 crore is given to his family by the Central Government as assistance.” Rahul Gandhi should not make wrong statements on Agniveers, he is working to mislead the House.

    Rahul had also spread a lie on the first martyr Agniveer.
    In October 2023, Rahul Gandhi had spread a lie about the first martyr Agniveer Laxman Gavte and misled the youth of the country and incited them against the army. Agniveer jawan Akshay Laxman Gavte posted in Siachen died during duty. Laxman Gavte was the first Agniveer who died during duty. At the same time, an RTI revealed that the government has provided financial assistance of more than one crore rupees to the family of Akshay Laxman Gavte. Laxman was part of the Fire and Fury Corps (14 Corps) of the Indian Army, which is posted in Ladakh. While implementing the Agneepath scheme, the government had said that if any Agniveer dies during duty, he will get the insurance amount.

    Rahul Gandhi had said – ‘Two types of soldiers’ in the country
    During the Lok Sabha elections 2024, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had said that PM Modi has created ‘two types of soldiers’ in the country. He said, “…one is the son of a poor, Dalit, minority and the other is from a rich family. He has given a new name to the son of the poor – Agniveer, who will not get any facilities like pension, canteen … But, if you are a senior officer or any one of these four, then you will get all these things. In the army, he has created ‘two-India’, two types of ‘martyrs’.”

    Rahul Gandhi had said – ‘Two types of soldiers’ in the country
    During the Lok Sabha elections 2024, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had said that PM Modi has created ‘two types of soldiers’ in the country. He said, “…one is the son of a poor, Dalit, minority and the other is from a rich family. He has given a new name to the son of the poor – Agniveer, who will not get any facilities like pension, canteen … But, if you are a senior officer or any one of these four, then you will get all these things. In the army, he has created ‘two-India’, two types of ‘martyrs’.”

    For whose benefit so many lies were spread about the army?
    Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accusing the Congress of spreading blatant lies about army recruitment, on July 2 asked in the Parliament that for whose benefit so many lies are being spread about the army. Responding to the discussion on the motion of thanks in Lok Sabha on the President’s address, PM Modi said that blatant lies are being spread by the Congress about army recruitment so that youth do not join the army. He said that lies are being spread to stop youth from joining the army. I want to know for whose benefit the Congress wants to weaken our armies. For whose benefit is it spreading so many lies about the army

    Cannot see Indian army becoming strong
    The Prime Minister said that the Congress people can never see the Indian army becoming strong. He said who does not know how weak the country’s army was during the times of Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru. Congress carried out scams worth lakhs and crores of rupees in our army which weakened the country’s army. Ever since the country became independent, Congress has started a tradition of corruption in the Navy, Army and Air Force. Citing the Jeep scam, submarine scam and Bofors scams, he said that these scams prevented the country’s strength from increasing.

    Agniveer Yojana hits Congress’s sore spot
    Modi government has touched Congress’s sore spot with Agniveer Yojana. This is going to ruin their entire future planning. If anyone is going to suffer the most from Agniveer, it is China, if there is a war or clash between India and China. Rahul Gandhi does not have a problem with Agniveer’s salary, compensation and career. The first reason for Rahul’s worry is China because Congress has made a secret agreement with China. The second reason is appeasement. Congress has been winning elections only by appeasement. Peace loving communities believe in Jihad and Congress gives them a free hand in the states ruled by it. But now they are worried about what will happen when there will be 1000 and 2000 Agniveers in every city. They know their future planning, so they have also understood that this is an arrangement for their treatment.  

  • Why does an aging Biden-Trump run America? Why do so many aging old leaders run America?

    Why does an aging Biden-Trump run America? Why do so many aging old leaders run America?

    Why does an aging Biden-Trump run America? Why do so many aging old leaders run America?

    Given the age of both the presidential candidates in America, there is talk of retirement from politics in India. Bharatiya Janata Party has made 75 years the retirement age for its leaders.

    There has always been a debate around the world about what should be the age of a country’s leader. Till what age can he work with more energy and mental capacity and take decisions. A data from Bloomberg says that in the year 2019, the average age of a world leader is 65 years and in Europe it is around 59 years.

    Surprisingly, the average age of world leaders has increased across the world in the last few decades. According to Bloomberg data, the average age of world leaders in the 1950s was 59 years. If we look at the age of the current leaders of the world, 89 year old Raul Castro is the head of state of Cuba. However, now a new wind of young heads of state has started blowing in Europe. In most of the countries, the new heads of state are between 30 and 50 years of age.

    Now Americans have two candidates who are divided by ideology, but united. Both white men were born in the 1940s, before the invention of Velcro and the independence of India and Israel and China. Amazingly, each is currently older than any of the last three U.S. presidents.

    In such a situation, the question definitely arises whether the people of America now want to see an older and experienced person as the head of the nation. Biden is 81 years old. There is controversy over whether he is absolutely fit on the fitness front or not.

    Trump is currently three years younger than Biden. When mppower before President Biden, he was 70 years old, but fitness never came in the way of Trump’s work.

    Biden, 81, jokingly said in April 2024, “Of course, the 2024 election is in full swing and yes, age is an issue: I’m a grown man running against a 6-year-old.” President Trump, whom he called “Sleepy Don.”

    America has seen presidents of different ages in the last three decades. If three decades ago, George W. Bush Sr. had become President after turning 64 and there were reports expressing concern over his fitness. So after him, Bill Clinton, who defeated him in the elections in 1992, was only 46 years old. He had tremendous energy and great charm in his personality.

    81 Biden and 77-78 Trump are the two most likely to become the next president. Each will be the oldest president to deliver an inaugural address in American history. But both feel young to run America!!

    Right now I’m young (I’m young, I’m young)

    I am still young

    I am still young

    Right now I…

    I am still young

    Yes, the sun of beauty (It is sunny, it is sunny)

    Hmm, I have a sweet look

    Yes, the sunshine of beauty

    I have a sweet look

    I am the swift current of the river

    I am desperate for a sweet one

    I am from Laila’s heart.

    I am the tongue of Heer

    Right now I…

    Right now I’m young (I’m young, I’m young)

    I am still young

    I am still young

    Right now I…

    I am still young

    I’m jam full (full, full)

    I’m thirsty for lips

    yes, i’m jam packed

    I’m thirsty for lips

    squint and look

    i’m around the heart

    I am the desire of lovers

    I am a statement of love

    Right now I…

    I am still young

    I am still young

    I am still young

    Right now I…

    I am still young

    Right now I’m young (I’m young, I’m young)

    I am still young

    I am still young

    Prominent figures in American politics are making headlines because of their age. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced her plans to step down as leader of House Democrats. At the age of 82, Pelosi said the time has come for a new generation of leadership. However, she will retain her seat and Congress and has no plans to retire.

    Donald Trump made it official, announcing that he is running again to become President of the United States. Trump is 77 years old. If voters give him another chance to go to the White House, he will be 78 years old.

    Now what about the man in the White House? Joe Biden too old for the president position again in second term

    One possibility is that this is just randomness. You might think this is just an election that Trump and Biden have upset, and young people are waiting. But old age runs deep in modern presidential electoral politics. Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton, the losers of the last two presidential elections, were born a month apart in 1947.

    The mystery of America’s oldest presidential candidates is actually two separate questions – one of demand, and one of supply. Derek Thompson has analysed this in one of his articles.

    The most obvious reason why America’s presidential candidates are so old may be that Americans are getting older. Voters over the age of 65 regularly go to the polls more often than younger voters, and political-science research has found that voters generally prefer candidates “closest to them in age”.

    Perhaps it is about youth being disengaged from politics for decades. According to The Economist, older Americans outnumber younger Americans by a wider margin than in the typical OECD country. This is especially true at the local level. As Timothy Noah writes in Politico, studies have shown that the average age of a voter in America’s municipal elections is 57 – “almost a generation older than the average age of eligible voters.”

    Since 1996, each new President has had less national political experience than the previous Commander-in-Chief when he or she was elected. Bill Clinton was a newer face than George HW Bush, but he had more gubernatorial experience than George W. Bush, who in turn had been governor longer than Barack Obama had been a senator. Then came Trump, who had no political experience.

    The perfect “familiar surprise” in politics might be a character like Trump: a celebrity who also represents a shock to the political system. If the future of American politics belongs to seasoned amateurs, the scale might be subtly tilted toward consoling those paternalistic figures who are not steeped in the poison of contemporary politics, either because they are out of the game (Biden Like) or because they’ve consistently rejected its rules (like Sanders).

    American leadership has become very old, it has completely fallen down.

    The American government is a creaking machine whose most critical parts can generously be described as “outdated.” The average age in Congress is near an all-time high. The Speaker of the House, the House Majority Leader, the House Majority Whip, and the Senate Majority Leader are all over 75.

    This phenomenon is bigger than politics. In business, science, and finance, power is concentrated among the elderly. Over the past 40 years, the average age of Nobel Prize winners has increased in almost every discipline, including physics, chemistry, medicine and literature. Among S&P 500 companies, the average age of incoming CEOs has increased by 14 years over the past 14 years. Americans age 55 and older make up less than one-third of the population, but own two-thirds of the nation’s wealth – the highest level of wealth concentration on record.

    Why does an aging Biden-Trump run America? Why do so many old people run America?

    For those who voted: According to Wikipedia, voter turnout in the 2020 presidential election was highest among those aged 65 to 74 at 76.0%, while turnout was lowest among those aged 18 to 24 at 51.4%.

    Older pleaders have the money, political skills, and networks to run, and older people (who are voting for older people) are voting in greater numbers, making the oldest people the holders of the most power.

    The peak number of leaders turning 65 in the US will be in 2023, so older people aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.

    As per the U.S. Census Bureau, by 2040, the population of American adults age 65 and older will nearly double.

    Important point to note is that if young people don’t start voting, the younger generation will not be able to take control of America’s leadership until all the baby boomers die off.

    By 2055, it is estimated that there will still be 30 million people in the United States who were born before 1965 – the majority of whom will be boomers.

    The younger generation means youth needs to increase their democratic participation and run for office or at least vote. The future of the United States is in their hands.

    The concentration of power in the hands of aged people, who are also richer, will predictably lead to policies that benefit the aged and richer at the expense of the less privileged. The federal government already guarantees seniors universal health insurance and universal basic income, even as Republicans beat drum of socialism when young people request versions of the same policies. It is unlikely that young people will achieve many policy victories in a government whose average age is over 70.

    Further, the old regime may be misgovernance. At the end of the Cold War, a common criticism of the USSR was that the country was collapsing partly because the Soviet Politburo was too old and unable to keep pace with the changing world. Research indicates that cognitive decline typically accelerates in the 70s. Without encouraging voters or employers to be ageist, it seems risky to leave the most important issues of life, death, and well-being in the hands of a group of seventy-year-olds who are biologically on the verge of predictable cognitive decline. Are.

    **

    Young people are lagging behind the elderly in America 24 percent not self-reliant, 35 percent dependent on parents

    In America, 2 out of every 5 youth i.e. 40 percent are struggling for economic resources. There are 50 percent youth who are not able to stop unnecessary expenses. At the same time, the number of such elders is only 11 percent, who are struggling the least compared to other generations. A recent One Poll survey has shattered the notion that American youth spend their own money and take up their financial responsibilities quickly.

    According to the survey, parents are bearing the entire expenses of 58 percent of American youth. Overall, this survey makes it clear that the situation of American youth is not good in terms of financial responsibility. Youth in America are lagging behind even the elders! 24 percent not self-reliant, 35 percent dependent on parents

    In America, 2 out of every 5 youth i.e. 40 percent are struggling for financial resources. There are 50 percent youth who are not able to stop unnecessary expenses. At the same time, the number of such elders is only 11 percent, who are struggling the least compared to other generations. A recent One Poll survey has broken the notion that American youth bear their own expenses and take care of their financial responsibilities quickly.

    According to the survey, parents are bearing the entire expenses of 58 percent of American youth. Overall, this survey makes it clear that the situation of American youth is not good from the point of view of financial responsibility.

    Writer of this book received few comments:

    **

    Why do old people run the United States? We don’t take them seriously because of their age, so why are they in power? Why are American politicians so old? Why don’t they retire? He is addicted to the power, bribery and corruption that comes with being a respected official. Note that many people are very rich, far beyond their income level.

    **

    Why are so many senior American politicians so old? Some die and no one resigns. Most politicians have worked in politics their entire adult lives. Usually they have been elected to the post several times. They have seniority and lots of facilities. Why would they leave? As a result they grow old in the office. No one is willing to step aside for young people. Or anyone else for that matter: Leonard Roberts

    Why are so many American politicians so old and why are they allowed to remain in office past the age of 65? Because the United States Constitution does not have a maximum age limit for elected officials. The Constitution is the structure of our government. It prescribes a lower age limit but no upper age limit. Therefore, there is no upper age limit for politicians. Franklin Vaux

    Terry Schur explains why Congress has become so old, and isn’t it time for it to take over government leadership?

    John F. Kennedy said, is not even close to happening. The Constitution should be amended to include a maximum age in addition to the minimum.

    According to the Constitution, the US President must be at least 35 years of age, be a resident of the US for at least 14 years, be born in the US, or have at least one parent be a US citizen.

    At the age of 43, John F. Kennedy was the youngest elected President. Bill Clinton was 46, Barack Obama was 47.

    In 2024, Joe Biden is the oldest presidential candidate in US history at the age of 81. Donald Trump is 77, Ronald Reagan was 69, George HW Bush was 64.

    America’s two oldest senators are both 87 years old. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has held her California seat for 30 years since 1992, and Chuck Grassley (D-IA) has held his seat for 41 years since 1981.

    6 senators are at least 80 years old, and 23 senators are over 70 years old.

    **

    CNBC poll shows most Americans don’t want Biden or Trump back in power in 2024

    The poll found that 61% of the public believes Trump should not seek the presidency, while 30% believe he should seek the presidency. And 70% say Biden should not run for a second term, with only 19% supporting the run.

    Biden and Trump are both old. So why are voters only paying attention to one of them?

    NBC News interviewed dozens of voters about whether they are concerned about Biden’s aging — and whether it’s as big an issue for Trump.

    Trump is actually just three years younger than Biden.

    “Trump comes across as a very young person who is undecided about 2024,” said Renee King, a two-time Trump voter in Mondamin, Iowa.

    “…I feel like Trump has moved with the times and Biden hasn’t,” said Jane Story, 56, a Trump supporter in Ames, Iowa.

    Don Brockett of Hampton, New Hampshire, said Trump feels like he is “blessed with the ability, like Mick Jagger, to stay young forever.”

    Biden’s doctor declared him healthy and “fit for duty” in February 2023, despite opinion polls showing that a majority of Americans are concerned about Biden’s age.

    US Presidents usually say the wrong things at the wrong time, after which their administrations have to issue clarifications.

    On November 13, Biden referred to US Vice President Kamala Harris as “President Harris”.

    “President Harris is here to make sure we do this right,” Biden said during a sporting event. Biden’s comments have at times put his administration in a difficult position.

    “There is no doubt in my mind, I will vote for Biden. But we need age limits in politicians, and I would like to see much younger candidates,” said Tammy, a Democratic voter in Geauga County, Ohio, who declined to give her last name.

    Mary Miller, 60, of Novelty, Ohio, has voted Republican most of her life but supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. She is pleased with Biden’s performance but says she is concerned about his age.https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/biden-trump-old-voters-age-issue-rcna104316

    **

    The presence of elderly candidates like Joe Biden and Donald Trump running for President of the United States often raises questions and concerns among voters. Here is a point-by-point explanation of why such elderly individuals run for office and why they are still considered viable candidates:

    Experience in leadership roles: Both Biden and Trump have held leadership positions before running for president. Biden’s experience as vice president and Trump’s experience as a business executive gave him the leadership skills and insight that he argues qualify him for the presidency despite his age.

    Accumulated Experience: Older individuals have typically accumulated decades of experience in various fields, including politics, business, and public service. This depth of experience can be invaluable when making complex decisions.

    The primary reason older individuals run for office is their extensive experience in politics and governance. Both Biden and Trump have decades of experience in public life. Biden served several terms as a senator before becoming vice president under Barack Obama, while Trump, though not a career politician, had been involved in various business ventures and public events prior to his presidency.

    Established Networks: Over the years, older individuals have had more time to build extensive networks of contacts and allies, which can be crucial for success in politics and leadership roles.

    Older candidates often have well-established networks within their respective political parties and donors. These networks can provide vital assistance in terms of fundraising, campaign infrastructure and support, making it easier for them to run a successful campaign.

    Recognition and name recognition: Both Biden and Trump are widely recognized figures in American politics. Their names are familiar to most voters, which may give them an advantage in terms of gaining attention and support, especially during primary elections where name recognition plays an important role.

    Historical Context: Older individuals may have a better understanding of historical events and how they have shaped the current socio-political landscape. This historical perspective can inform decision-making and strategy.

    Perceived Wisdom: In many cultures, there is a stereotype that equates age with wisdom. As a result, older individuals may be perceived as more capable and trustworthy leaders by the general public.

    Stability and Consistency: Older leaders may be seen as more stable and consistent in their decision-making compared to younger counterparts who might be perceived as more impulsive or prone to change.

    Life Expectancy and Health: While age is often a concern for older candidates, advances in health care and increased life expectancy mean that individuals can live active and productive lives even in their 70s and 80s. Both Biden and Trump were required to undergo rigorous medical evaluations during their campaigns to assure voters of their suitability for office.

    Representation and Democracy: In a democracy, any person who meets the constitutional requirements for the office can run for president. Age is not explicitly a disqualifier, and voters ultimately have the power to decide whether a candidate’s age is of concern to them. Older candidates argue that their age brings wisdom and experience, which they believe are important qualities for effective leadership.

    Financial Security: Older individuals who have had successful careers often have greater financial resources, which can provide them with the means to pursue and maintain positions of power.

    Legacy Building: Many older individuals are concerned with their legacy and how they will be remembered. This can motivate them to seek out leadership positions and leave a lasting impact on society.

    Cultural Norms: American culture tends to value experience and seniority, which can contribute to older individuals holding prominent positions in various sectors, including politics.

    Electoral Preferences: Older individuals may be more likely to vote and participate in the political process, giving them greater influence in elections and candidate selection.

    Institutional Knowledge: Older individuals who have been involved in politics for many years often possess invaluable institutional knowledge about how government operates, which can be essential for effective governance.

    Leadership Development: Many older leaders have had opportunities for leadership development throughout their careers, which have prepared them for higher positions of responsibility.

    Role Models: Older leaders can serve as role models for younger generations, inspiring them to pursue careers in public service and leadership.

    Political Patronage: In some cases, older individuals may benefit from political patronage networks that support their ascent to power and help them maintain their positions.

    Political Ideology: Despite their ages, both Biden and Trump represent different political ideologies within their respective parties. Biden is considered a moderate Democrat, while Trump’s presidency marked a shift within the Republican Party toward a more populist and nationalist agenda. Their ideological stances resonate with certain sections of the electorate, which contributes to their appeal as candidates.

    Cultural Attitudes toward Age: American culture often respects and reveres older individuals, viewing them as repositories of knowledge and experience worthy of leadership positions.

    Risk Aversion: Older leaders may be more risk-averse, preferring stability and incremental change over radical reforms or upheavals.

    Power Structures: Existing power structures within organizations and institutions may favor older individuals, making it easier for them to rise to the top.

    Access to Resources: Older individuals who have been in leadership positions for a long time may have accumulated significant resources and influence, further cementing their power.

    Political Traditions: In many cases, political traditions and norms favor older individuals, with age often seen as synonymous with authority and legitimacy.

    Respect for Elders: Many cultures, including American culture, place a high value on respecting elders, which can contribute to older individuals holding positions of influence and power.

    Continuity and Stability: Older leaders may be seen as providing continuity and stability in times of uncertainty or crisis, which can be reassuring to the public and other stakeholders.

    These points provide a broad overview of some of the reasons why older individuals often hold significant positions of power in America. Depending on the focus of your essay, you may choose to explore some of these points in more detail or add additional factors to further support your argument.

    In short, the candidacy of Biden and Trump is based on their experience, name recognition, political ideology, and perception of their fitness for office, regardless of age. Although concerns about age and health are legitimate considerations for voters, they are not necessarily prohibitive factors in a candidate’s ability to run for and hold the highest office in the United States. Ultimately, voters weigh a candidate’s age along with other factors such as policies, character, and leadership abilities when making their decision at the ballot box.

    Mark Mather and Paola Scommegna explains: The aging of the American population brings both challenges and opportunities for the economy, infrastructure, and institutions.

    Positive development

    The level of education is increasing. In 1965 only 5% of people age 65 and older had completed four years or more of college. This share will increase to 33% by 2023.6

    Older adults are working longer hours.

    The poverty rate for Americans age 65 and older has fallen rapidly over the past 50 years, from nearly 30% in 1966 to 10% today.

    Older adults can meet their daily care needs. Older adults are better able to function on their own, and a higher share are living in nursing homes and assisted living than a decade ago.

    Challenges

    Gains in life expectancy have stalled recently. US life expectancy at birth has declined by 2.4 years between 2019 and 2021. Besides COVID-19 pandemic, deaths from drug overdoses, heart disease, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, and suicide also played a role. The prevalence of obesity among older Americans has increased at an alarming rate.

    Wide economic inequalities are found among different population subgroups.

    More older adults are getting divorced than previous generations.

    Older women are living alone.

    Older Americans face a care gap, especially those with low incomes and dementia.

    Due to the larger share of older adults, Social Security and Medicare expenditures will increase from 9.1% of GDP in 2023 to 11.5% by 2035.19

    The Age Factor in Politics

    1. The Perception of Age

    Public perception plays a significant role in evaluating political leaders. In the case of Biden and Trump, their advanced ages have raised concerns among some Americans. According to a survey, 67% of respondents believe that President Joe Biden, at 81 years old, is too old to serve another term. In contrast, only 41% feel the same way about former President Donald Trump, who is 771. This discrepancy highlights the subjective nature of age-related judgments.

    2. The Super-Ager Phenomenon

    Both Biden and Trump fall into a category known as “super-agers.” These individuals maintain robust mental and physical functioning, often outperforming their peers in terms of longevity. Despite their age, super-agers exhibit resilience and adaptability. Research indicates that both candidates have a higher probability of surviving a four-year term relative to other men their age2.

    3. Life Expectancy and Survival Odds

    To assess their prospects, we turn to life expectancy data. Demographers use life tables, which provide probabilities of survival based on age-specific death rates. These tables reveal that almost 99% of all people born in the U.S. survive from age 0 to 20, over 95% survive to age 40, and more than 85% reach age 60. Biden and Trump, both non-Hispanic white men, have distinct probabilities of surviving to specific ages. Based on 2021 data, Biden has a 92.9% chance of surviving at least until age 821.

    4. The Role of Cognitive Abilities

    While concerns about cognitive abilities arise, the life expectancy argument remains compelling. The four-year age difference between Biden and Trump doesn’t significantly impact their odds of completing a presidential term. Both men are likely to survive, given their super-ager status and the statistical probabilities1.

    5. Unique Aging Leadership

    America’s aging politicians raise questions about leadership continuity. Unlike countries with term limits, the U.S. lacks such constraints. Some leaders cling to power due to personal reasons, perpetuating an aging leadership phenomenon. However, this uniqueness also allows for experience and historical context to shape decision-making3.

    In conclusion, while age is a valid consideration, it should not overshadow other critical factors like competence, vision, and policy. Biden and Trump, despite their years, remain formidable contenders, challenging the notion that age alone disqualifies them from running America4. As long as they maintain their super-ager status, their leadership capabilities endure.

    “We have people who are in their 80s and running the country, and that is unique.” — Mr. Munger3

    Remember, leadership transcends mere numbers; it hinges on wisdom, resilience, and adaptability. America’s elder statesmen continue to shape the nation’s destiny, proving that age need not be a barrier to effective governance5.

    Learn more

    In the end the Yaksha question again arises. Why are America’s politicians so old – and does age matter in politics? (The proverb Yaksha Prashna is used in the context of a problem or problem for which no solution has been found yet or the problem remains as it is.)

    Fellow veteran Senator Dianne Feinstein, 81, of U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell made headlines for a series of seemingly geriatric incidents, which began when she returned from a long sick leave and insisted she was not far.

    Mr Biden hopes to be re-elected next year at the age of 82, allowing him to remain in the White House until he is 86.

    A December 2023 AP-NORC poll showed that 77 percent of respondents believe Mr. Biden is too old to effectively serve another term. For Mr. Trump, the figure is 51 percent.

    As Ms Matthews says: “He has the feelings of an old man.”

    “The Democrats face likely decimation in this year’s midterm elections in November, which will set up a crushingly depressing 2024 rematch between Biden and Trump.”

  • चाणक्य के उद्धरण Quotes

    चाणक्य के उद्धरण Quotes

    ” दूसरों की गलतियों से सीखें …आप इतनी देर तक जीवित नहीं रह सकते कि आप उन सभी गलतियों को खुद ही कर सकें” ~ चाणक्य

    चाणक्य एक भारतीय शिक्षक, दार्शनिक, अर्थशास्त्री, न्यायविद और सलाहकार थे। चाणक्य एक महान विचारक और कूटनीतिज्ञ रहे हैं। चाणक्य पूरे उपमहाद्वीप में फैले एकजुट भारत की परिकल्पना करने वाले शुरुआती लोगों में से एक हैं। मूल रूप से तक्षशिला के प्राचीन विश्वविद्यालय में अर्थशास्त्र और राजनीति विज्ञान के शिक्षक, चाणक्य ने पहले मौर्य सम्राट चंद्रगुप्त को कम उम्र में सत्ता में लाने में कामयाबी हासिल की थी। नतीजतन, उन्हें व्यापक रूप से मौर्य साम्राज्य की स्थापना में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाने का श्रेय दिया जाता है। चाणक्य ने सम्राट चंद्रगुप्त और उनके पुत्र बिन्दुसार दोनों के मुख्य सलाहकार के रूप में कार्य किया।

    उनकी शिक्षाओं को दो पुस्तकों- अर्थशास्त्र (“भौतिक लाभ का विज्ञान”) और चाणक्य नीति में एक साथ रखा गया है । अर्थशास्त्र  _इसे चाणक्य की प्रशिक्षण पुस्तिका माना जाता है जिसके द्वारा उन्होंने चन्द्रगुप्त को एक नागरिक से एक राजा में बदल दिया। ऐसा कहा जा रहा है कि, कोई भी उनकी बुद्धिमत्ता पर सवाल नहीं उठा सकता। वह कोई योद्धा नहीं था, लेकिन उसने अपने मस्तिष्क का उपयोग करके लड़ाई लड़ी।

    “एक बार जब आप किसी चीज़ पर काम करना शुरू कर दें तो असफलता से न डरें और न ही उसे छोड़ें। जो लोग ईमानदारी से काम करते हैं वे सबसे ज्यादा खुश रहते हैं।” ~  चाणक्य

    “शेर से एक उत्कृष्ट बात जो सीखी जा सकती है वह यह है कि एक आदमी जो कुछ भी करने का इरादा रखता है उसे पूरे दिल और ज़ोरदार प्रयास के साथ करना चाहिए।” ~  चाणक्य

    “उससे बचो जो तुम्हारे सामने मीठी-मीठी बातें करता है, परन्तु तुम्हारी पीठ पीछे तुम्हें बरबाद करने की कोशिश करता है, क्योंकि वह जहर से भरे घड़े के समान है जिसके ऊपर दूध डाला जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “शिक्षा सबसे अच्छी मित्र है। शिक्षित व्यक्ति का हर जगह सम्मान होता है। शिक्षा सुंदरता और यौवन को मात देती है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “एक विद्वान व्यक्ति को लोगों द्वारा सम्मानित किया जाता है। एक विद्वान व्यक्ति अपनी शिक्षा के लिए हर जगह सम्मान पाता है। सचमुच, सीखने का हर जगह सम्मान किया जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “धन, मित्र, पत्नी और राज्य पुनः प्राप्त किया जा सकता है, लेकिन यह शरीर खो जाने पर फिर कभी प्राप्त नहीं किया जा सकता।” ~  चाणक्य

    ” दूसरों की गलतियों से सीखें …आप इतनी देर तक जीवित नहीं रह सकते कि आप उन सभी गलतियों को खुद ही कर सकें” ~ चाणक्य

    “आदमी अकेला पैदा होता है और अकेला ही मर जाता है; और वह अपने कर्मों के अच्छे और बुरे परिणाम अकेले ही भोगता है; और वह अकेला ही नरक या परमधाम चला जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “जब तक आपका शरीर स्वस्थ और नियंत्रण में है और मृत्यु दूर है, तब तक अपनी आत्मा को बचाने का प्रयास करें; जब मृत्यु आसन्न है तो आप क्या कर सकते हैं?” ~  चाणक्य

    “अशिक्षित मनुष्य का जीवन कुत्ते की पूँछ के समान बेकार है जो न तो उसके पिछले हिस्से को ढकती है और न ही उसे कीड़ों के काटने से बचाती है।” ~  चाणक्य

    //////////////

    “ज्ञान अभ्यास में लाए बिना खो जाता है; अज्ञान के कारण मनुष्य खो जाता है”

    “वाणी की शुद्धता, मन की पवित्रता, इंद्रियों की शुद्धता और दयालु हृदय की आवश्यकता उस व्यक्ति को होती है जो दिव्य मंच पर चढ़ने की इच्छा रखता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “फूलों की खुशबू हवा की दिशा में ही फैलती है।” लेकिन, व्यक्ति की अच्छाई हर दिशा में फैलती है” ~ चाणक्य

    “हमें जो बीत गया उसके लिए चिंतित नहीं होना चाहिए, न ही हमें भविष्य के बारे में चिंतित होना चाहिए; समझदार लोग केवल वर्तमान क्षण से ही निपटते हैं । ~  चाणक्य

    “कभी भी यह प्रकट न करें कि आपने क्या करने के बारे में सोचा है, बल्कि बुद्धिमानी से सलाह के द्वारा इसे क्रियान्वित करने के लिए दृढ़ संकल्पित होकर इसे गुप्त रखें।” ~  चाणक्य

    “जिसका ज्ञान किताबों तक ही सीमित है और जिसका धन दूसरों के कब्जे में है , वह आवश्यकता पड़ने पर न तो ज्ञान और न ही धन का उपयोग कर सकता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    ” पृथ्वी सत्य की शक्ति पर टिकी हुई है, यह सत्य की शक्ति ही है जो सूर्य को चमकाती है और हवाएँ चलती है, वास्तव में सभी चीजें सत्य पर टिकी हैं।” ~  चाणक्य

    “आप जिस लायक हैं उससे कम पर कभी समझौता न करें। यह घमंड नहीं, स्वाभिमान है।” ~  चाणक्य

    मोदी जी CM बनाने के पहले कभी चुनाव नहीं लड़े। उन्हें  गुजरात के उप मुख्यमंत्री का दायित्व निभाने के लिए कहा गया। उस समय केशुभाई पटेल मुख्यमंत्री थे। नरेंद्र मोदी जी ने कहा वे गुजरात में मुख्यमंत्री की हैशियत से ही कार्य करना चाहते हैं। तदुपरान्त उन्हें गुजरात मुख्यमंत्री का दायित्व दे कर २००२ में भेजा गया।  

    “जो भविष्य के लिए तैयार रहता है और जो आने वाली किसी भी स्थिति से चतुराई से निपटता है, दोनों खुश रहते हैं, लेकिन भाग्यवादी व्यक्ति जो पूरी तरह से भाग्य पर निर्भर रहता है, वह बर्बाद हो जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    ////////////////////////////////////////

    “धन, मित्र, पत्नी और राज्य पुनः प्राप्त किया जा सकता है, लेकिन यह शरीर खो जाने पर फिर कभी प्राप्त नहीं किया जा सकता।” ~  चाणक्य

    ” दूसरों की गलतियों से सीखें …आप इतनी देर तक जीवित नहीं रह सकते कि आप उन सभी गलतियों को खुद ही कर सकें” ~ चाणक्य

    चाणक्य एक भारतीय शिक्षक, दार्शनिक, अर्थशास्त्री, न्यायविद और सलाहकार थे। चाणक्य एक महान विचारक और कूटनीतिज्ञ रहे हैं। चाणक्य पूरे उपमहाद्वीप में फैले एकजुट भारत की परिकल्पना करने वाले शुरुआती लोगों में से एक हैं। मूल रूप से तक्षशिला के प्राचीन विश्वविद्यालय में अर्थशास्त्र और राजनीति विज्ञान के शिक्षक, चाणक्य ने पहले मौर्य सम्राट चंद्रगुप्त को कम उम्र में सत्ता में लाने में कामयाबी हासिल की थी। नतीजतन, उन्हें व्यापक रूप से मौर्य साम्राज्य की स्थापना में महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाने का श्रेय दिया जाता है। चाणक्य ने सम्राट चंद्रगुप्त और उनके पुत्र बिन्दुसार दोनों के मुख्य सलाहकार के रूप में कार्य किया।

    उनकी शिक्षाओं को दो पुस्तकों- अर्थशास्त्र (“भौतिक लाभ का विज्ञान”) और चाणक्य नीति में एक साथ रखा गया है । अर्थशास्त्र  _इसे चाणक्य की प्रशिक्षण पुस्तिका माना जाता है जिसके द्वारा उन्होंने चन्द्रगुप्त को एक नागरिक से एक राजा में बदल दिया। ऐसा कहा जा रहा है कि, कोई भी उनकी बुद्धिमत्ता पर सवाल नहीं उठा सकता। वह कोई योद्धा नहीं था, लेकिन उसने अपने मस्तिष्क का उपयोग करके लड़ाई लड़ी।

    “एक बार जब आप किसी चीज़ पर काम करना शुरू कर दें तो असफलता से न डरें और न ही उसे छोड़ें। जो लोग ईमानदारी से काम करते हैं वे सबसे ज्यादा खुश रहते हैं।” ~  चाणक्य

    “शेर से एक उत्कृष्ट बात जो सीखी जा सकती है वह यह है कि एक आदमी जो कुछ भी करने का इरादा रखता है उसे पूरे दिल और ज़ोरदार प्रयास के साथ करना चाहिए।” ~  चाणक्य

    “उससे बचो जो तुम्हारे सामने मीठी-मीठी बातें करता है, परन्तु तुम्हारी पीठ पीछे तुम्हें बरबाद करने की कोशिश करता है, क्योंकि वह जहर से भरे घड़े के समान है जिसके ऊपर दूध डाला जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “शिक्षा सबसे अच्छी मित्र है। शिक्षित व्यक्ति का हर जगह सम्मान होता है। शिक्षा सुंदरता और यौवन को मात देती है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “एक विद्वान व्यक्ति को लोगों द्वारा सम्मानित किया जाता है। एक विद्वान व्यक्ति अपनी शिक्षा के लिए हर जगह सम्मान पाता है। सचमुच, सीखने का हर जगह सम्मान किया जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    ” दूसरों की गलतियों से सीखें …आप इतनी देर तक जीवित नहीं रह सकते कि आप उन सभी गलतियों को खुद ही कर सकें” ~ चाणक्य

    “आदमी अकेला पैदा होता है और अकेला ही मर जाता है; और वह अपने कर्मों के अच्छे और बुरे परिणाम अकेले ही भोगता है; और वह अकेला ही नरक या परमधाम चला जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “अशिक्षित मनुष्य का जीवन कुत्ते की पूँछ के समान बेकार है जो न तो उसके पिछले हिस्से को ढकती है और न ही उसे कीड़ों के काटने से बचाती है।” ~  चाणक्य

    //////////////

     “ज्ञान अभ्यास में लाए बिना खो जाता है; अज्ञान के कारण मनुष्य खो जाता है”

    “वाणी की शुद्धता, मन की पवित्रता, इंद्रियों की शुद्धता और दयालु हृदय की आवश्यकता उस व्यक्ति को होती है जो दिव्य मंच पर चढ़ने की इच्छा रखता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    “फूलों की खुशबू हवा की दिशा में ही फैलती है।” लेकिन, व्यक्ति की अच्छाई हर दिशा में फैलती है” ~ चाणक्य

    “हमें जो बीत गया उसके लिए चिंतित नहीं होना चाहिए, न ही हमें भविष्य के बारे में चिंतित होना चाहिए; समझदार लोग केवल वर्तमान क्षण से ही निपटते हैं । ~  चाणक्य

    “कभी भी यह प्रकट न करें कि आपने क्या करने के बारे में सोचा है, बल्कि बुद्धिमानी से सलाह के द्वारा इसे क्रियान्वित करने के लिए दृढ़ संकल्पित होकर इसे गुप्त रखें।” ~  चाणक्य

    “जिसका ज्ञान किताबों तक ही सीमित है और जिसका धन दूसरों के कब्जे में है , वह आवश्यकता पड़ने पर न तो ज्ञान और न ही धन का उपयोग कर सकता है।” ~  चाणक्य

    ” पृथ्वी सत्य की शक्ति पर टिकी हुई है, यह सत्य की शक्ति ही है जो सूर्य को चमकाती है और हवाएँ चलती है, वास्तव में सभी चीजें सत्य पर टिकी हैं।” ~  चाणक्य

    “आप जिस लायक हैं उससे कम पर कभी समझौता न करें। यह घमंड नहीं, स्वाभिमान है।” ~  चाणक्य

    मोदी जी CM बनाने के पहले कभी चुनाव नहीं लड़े। उन्हें  गुजरात के उप मुख्यमंत्री का दायित्व निभाने के लिए कहा गया। उस समय केशुभाई पटेल मुख्यमंत्री थे। नरेंद्र मोदी जी ने कहा वे गुजरात में मुख्यमंत्री की हैशियत से ही कार्य करना चाहते हैं। तदुपरान्त उन्हें गुजरात मुख्यमंत्री का दायित्व दे कर २००२ में भेजा गया।  

    “जो भविष्य के लिए तैयार रहता है और जो आने वाली किसी भी स्थिति से चतुराई से निपटता है, दोनों खुश रहते हैं, लेकिन भाग्यवादी व्यक्ति जो पूरी तरह से भाग्य पर निर्भर रहता है, वह बर्बाद हो जाता है।” ~  चाणक्य

  • Raj Dharma: From the Vedic Period to Present

    16 August 2018: Whenever the Gujarat riots are mentioned, Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s ‘Rajdharma’ is definitely discussed. A journalist asked him, have you brought any message for Chief Minister Narendra Modi? To this Vajpayee replied in his inimitable style, ‘I would only say that he should follow Raj Dharma. These words are very meaningful. I am following the same and trying to follow. There can be no distinction between the subjects for the king or the ruler, neither on the basis of birth, nor on the basis of caste and community….” However, soon after this, Atal ji said that he believed that Narendra Modi should follow his Rajdharma. are doing.

    The Supreme Court on Friday, 24 June 2022, gave a clean chit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the then Gujarat CM, in the Godhra incident.

    Former Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said on the plea challenging the clean chit given by the Supreme Court’s Special Investigation Team (SIT) to then Gujarat Chief Minister and current Prime Minister Narendra Modi and 63 others in the 2002 Godhra riots case Friday June 24, 2022 Rejected after hearing. Ravi Shankar said that the petition was filed by Zakia Jafri, wife of Congress MP Ehsan Jafri who was killed in the Gujarat riots. Along with Teesta Setalvad, Ravi Shankar also targeted the Congress, RJD chief Lalu Prasad and the Left parties.

    9 December 2022 Gujarat created history, BJP not only won 156 seats but also made a record.

    In the electoral history of Gujarat, BJP has registered the biggest and banging victory so far. BJP has created a new history by winning a record 156 seats in the 182-seat assembly. BJP has created a new history by winning a record 156 seats in the 182-seat assembly.

    Vedic Rajdharma system

    The meaning of Rajdharma is – ‘Religion of the king’ or ‘Duty of the king’. The name of this lesson is ‘Raj Dharma’, how the ruling class has to run the country. The Vedas are the core of the teachings of Rajdharma.

    Vidur Prajagar and Shantiparva of Mahabharata, the famous book Arthashastra composed by Chanakya also have a lot of explanation of Rajdharma, Swami Dayanand Saraswati has also written in detail on Rajdharma in Satyarth Prakash. There is a festival of the same name in the Mahabharata, in which Rajdharma has been discussed in detail.

    Rajdharma has been discussed in the 7th chapter of Manusmriti.

    पुत्र एव पितृगृह विषये यस्य मानवः।

    निर्भय विचरिष्यन्ति सा राजा राजसत्तम॥

    यथा पुत्रः पित्रग्रहे विश्रामये यस्य मानवाः।

    निर्भय विचरिष्यन्ति सहित राजा राजसत्तम॥

    In Manusmriti, punishment is the king and punishment is the ruler of the people, the protector of all subjects that is why wise people call punishment as religion. If the king wears the punishment with good intention, it makes all the subjects happy and if it is used without thinking, it destroys the king from all sides.

    Chanakya was the general secretary of Chandragupta Maurya. He is also known as Kautilya or Vishnugupta. Being the son of father Shri Chanak, he was called Chanakya. Vishnugupta, a great scholar of diplomacy, economics, politics and due to the ‘devious’ ‘good use’ of his great knowledge, in creative works like public welfare and building a united India; It is called Kautilya.

    Rajdharma is discussed in Kautilya’s Arthashastra.

    प्रजासुखे सुखं राज्यः प्रजानन च हिते हितम्।

    नटमप्रिय प्रिया राज्यः प्रजाना तु प्रियं प्रियं॥ (अर्थशास्त्र 1/19)

    (That is, the happiness of the king is in the happiness of the people, his interest is only in the interest of the subjects. The king has nothing to do with his own interest, only the interest of the subjects is his interest.)

    तस्मत् स्वधर्म भूतानां राजा न व्यभिचारयेत्।

    स्वधर्मसंधानो हि भूत मुख न नंदति॥ (अर्थशास्त्र 1/3)

     (That is, the king should not allow the people to deviate from his religion. The king should also follow his religion. The king who follows his religion in this way, remains happy in this world and the next.) Religion of the king It is the land of war. I have not only to kill my enemies but also to save my subjects

    According to Mukherjee (2013), good governance has been called Rajdharma in Indian scriptures. Rajdharma was the “code of conduct” or “rule of law” that was superior to the will of the ruler and governed all his actions (Kashyap, 2010). Rajdharma code of conduct i.e. good governance which is mentioned in ancient Indian scriptures like Bhagavad Gita, Vedas, Mahabharata in Sanskrit and Pali, Shantiparva, Nitisara, Ramayana, Arthashastra, Digha Nikaya, Jataka. It is the basic right of all the citizens to get good governance from the government and the government is bound for it.

    सर्वे धर्म सोपधर्मस्त्रायणं रण्यो धर्मादिति वेदचुनोमि

    एवम धर्मन राजधर्मेषु सरवन सर्वस्तम सम्प्रलिनन निबोध

    The essential functions of the state in the form of ethical behavior and moral standards are required for good governance as described in the Atrisanhita:

    दुष्टस्य दण्ड सुजानस्य पूजा न्यायेन कोषस्य च संप्रविधि
    अपेक्षापथोर्तिर्शु राष्ट्ररक्षा पंचैव यज्ञ कथिता नृपन्नम

    In the above verse, five selfless duties have been mentioned which should be performed by the king [state]. (Trisanhita-28).

    Kautilya has also included the above principles in the Arthashastra:

    प्रजासुखे सुखं राज्य प्रजानन च हिते हितम्
    नातम्प्रियं हितं राज्य प्रजनम तु प्रियं हितम्
    That is, the happiness of the king lies in the happiness of the subjects.

    The duties of the citizens as well as of the government are:

    Raj Dharma and Vyavahar Dharma are two sides of the same coin, where the king and the subjects have to follow Dharma – honestly and conscientiously which will result in good governance (Jois, 2017).

    Before independence, Rajpath was known as King’s Way and Janpath as Queen’s Way.

    After independence, the name of Queens Way was changed to Janpath. While the King’s Way came to be known as Rajpath. After completion of 75 years of independence, it has now been renamed as Kartavya Path. The central government believes that the Rajpath reflects the idea of a king who rules over the ruled. Whereas in a democratic India, the public is supreme. The change in name is an example of public dominance and its empowerment.

    “One should behave according to the scriptures” (Bhagavad-gita, Chapter XVI, verse 24).

    अक्रोध सत्यवचनम संविभाग क्षमा तथा

    प्रजना शेषु दारेषु शौचमद्रोह अव च

    आर्जवं ब्रुत्यभरणं नवैते सर्ववर्णिका 

    “Truth, being free from anger, sharing wealth with others (portfolio), forgiveness, begetting children from one’s wife alone (sexual morality), chastity, absence of enmity, straightforwardness and maintaining persons dependent on oneself are the nine rules.” religion of persons of all varnas” (Mahabharata Shantiparva 6-7-8).

    finsindia.org has also thrown light on secularism as religion, king’s responsibilities as supreme court, equality, unity etc.

    Supremacy of religion

    Merely creating a monarchy was not enough, Dharma was a force superior to the king, created to enable the king to protect and give to the people. The definition of religion is as follows:

    तदेतत क्षत्रस्य क्षत्रं युधर्मा, तस्मध धर्मत्परं नास्त्य

    अथो अबलियान बलियान समाशमसते धर्मेना, यथा राज्य एवम 

    “Dharma is the king of kings. None is superior to Dharma; Dharma aided by the power of the king enables the weak to dominate the strong” (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad 1-4-14)

    धर्मनिरपेक्षता के रूप में धर्म :

    The right to practice one’s religion was recognized in the Raja Dharma Pashandanaigam Category Poovvrata Ganadishu, Prasavratsamayam Raja Durge Janapada (Narada Smriti ( Dharmakosha P-870)

    In India where the Vedas were considered supreme, non-believers in the Vedas were to be protected in the same way as those who believed in the Vedas, indicating that under Raj Dharma, religion is secular (Jois, 2017)

    Equality: “No one is superior (ajyastaso) or inferior (aknishtas). All are brothers (ete bharatarah). Everyone should strive for the benefit of all and make progress collectively (saubhagyas samva vridhu). ( Rigveda Mandala-5, Sukta-60, Mantra-5)

    Everyone has an equal right to the commodities of food and water. The yoke of the chariot of life is placed equally on everyone’s shoulders. All must live together supporting each other, like the axle of a chariot wheel connecting its rim and hub” (Atharvaveda-Sangyan Sukta).

    Governance and Equality in Ramayana: Despite there being no written constitution of Ramarajya, the citizens had the right to equality and the path of development was open to all. All were equal in the eyes of the law.

    Governance and Equality was also present  in the Mahabharata as Ramayan.

  • Why is suicide (fidayeen) a sin and an insult to God?

    All the Hindu scriptures, including the Vedas, have not only called suicide (Fidayeen)a sin, but have also called it an insult to God. This truth is understood by the leadership and people of beloved India. Therefore, it is the duty of the Vedic leadership and the public to move from least suicide to zero suicide.

    The Vedas declare – Prajnanam Brahma, Aham Brahmasmi, Tattvamasi, Ayam Atma Brahma, Sarva Khalvidam Brahma Tajjalanithi i.e. Brahman is the Supreme Consciousness, I am Brahman, you are Brahman, this soul is Brahman and this whole visible world is Brahman form, because this world arises from Brahman only. ‘Atmavat Sarvabhuteshu’ consider all living beings as your soul. Shankar resides in pebbles that are why killing of living beings is considered as ‘Brahmhatya’.

    Sanatan Dharma is the oldest religion of the world, the proof of this is the Vedas. Vedas are a unique work of Vedic period’s oral tradition, which has been going on from generation to generation since last 6-7 thousand AD. Meditation and salvation are the gift of Nirvana i.e. Zero Zero o Bharat i.e. Sanatan Hindu Dharma.

    For the Vedic people, life is God. Along with doing the work, necessary rules are also needed.

    There are 4 purusharths of life- Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha. For this, discipline and performance of duty is necessary. Sanatan Dharma has bound every activity of man in scientific law. Vedic prayer and meditation and social service to the country is also our religion. In Atharvaveda, there is a collection of many mantras related to happiness-wealth, health, destruction of enemies etc. is one of them:

    यथा द्यौश्च पृथिवी च न बिभीतो न रिष्यतः। एवा मे प्राण मा विभेः।।1।

    Just as the sky and the earth are neither afraid nor destroyed, so is my soul! You too be free from fear. Never have any kind of fear. It is necessary to have boldness with restraint. Have fear only of God.

    In Atharvaveda, there is a collection of many mantras related to happiness-wealth, health, destruction of enemies etc. All this is the art of life.

    There are mainly two types of religions in the world. One action-oriented and the other faith-oriented. Hindu religion is karma-oriented, Non-hindu means non-conservative religion is faith-oriented. Jain, Buddhist, Sikh all these three are under Sanatan. Islam, Christianity, Judaism, all these three are under non-Hindu religion. Hindu religion gives complete freedom to people to believe and worship God or Gods and Goddesses according to their belief and if they do not have faith then they should not believe or worship them. There is no such freedom in non-Hindu religion. RSS chief Shri Mohan Bhagwat’s recent statements and meetings with Christian and Muslim religious leaders are proof of this.

    The friendly and intimate relationship that Narendra Modi ji has with the heads of Christian and Muslim countries of the world is also proof that Vasudhaiva Kutumkam is the motto of Vedic people, acceptance of co-existence.

    Sarve Bhavantu Sukhin: Sarve Santu Niramaya:

    Sarve Bhadrani Pashyantu Ma Kashchit Dukh Bhagbhavet.

    Ayam Nij: Paroveti Ganana Laghuchetsam.

    Udaarcharitana Tu Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.

    सर्वे भवन्तु सुखिन: सर्वे सन्तु निरामया:

    सर्वे भद्राणि पश्यन्तु मा कश्चित दु:ख भाग्भवेत।।

    अयं निज: परोवेति गणना लघुचेतसाम्।

    उदारचरितानां तु वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम।।

    Generosity and tolerance are in our hearts. India is the only country where its diversity is the reason for its unity. The reason for unity in diversity is due to the tolerance and generosity of Hinduism.

    The rights and duties that have been told after understanding every field and nature of life are based on psychology and science only. Vedic people believe in reincarnation. Vedic people believe in reincarnation. In the 22nd verse of the second chapter of Shrimad Bhagwad Gita, it is said- ‘Just as a man discards old clothes and wears new clothes, in the same way this soul also puts on a new body leaving the old body.’ It is said in the 5th verse of the fourth chapter- ‘O Arjuna, many births have passed for me and you. The only difference is that I know them all, but oh Parantap! You don’t know him.’

    Vedic religion and the secular India that believes in it is not expansionist. We believe that there is Shankar in every pebble, that is, there is God in every particle. It does not mean that every particle should be worshipped. This means that there is life in every particle. Trees also breathe and creepers too. The secrets and effects of every element of nature have been revealed in the Vedas.

    Charity in Puranas: King Rantidev got food after being hungry for 40 days, even then he was happy to give that food to the hungry guest who came to the shelter. Dadhichi gave even his bones to protect the gods, Shiv ji drank poison, Karna donated armor and earrings, This is the Vedic eternal tradition of India Hinduism i.e. Sanatan Dharma is considered to be the oldest religion in the world. The aim is – let us make the whole world great:

    Suicide is considered reprehensible in Vedas and other religious texts, because according to religion one gets life after many births. In such a situation, he should live fully, should not end it before time and should do some good work for human welfare. There is mention of 84 lakh Yonis in Padma Purana, animals, birds, insects, humans, trees, plants etc together make 84 lakh Yonis.

    In Atharvveda Twaan Mrityurdayatam Ma Pra Meshtha: May death protect you and you do not die prematurely. In the Atharvaveda itself, by saying Ut Tawan Mrityorpipar, the God of the Vedas has given a message, O living soul, I lift you up from death. By saying Mrityo Ma Purushvadhi, the Vedas gave a message that O Death, do not kill a man prematurely.

    Human birth is rare, body is not repeated,

    Taruvar as soon as the leaves fall, the daughter-in-law doesn’t feel scared

    Meaning: Kabirdas ji says that it is very rare to get a human birth, this body is not found again and again, just like a leaf that has fallen from a tree cannot be put back on the tree.

    Why human life is rare? Because life is given only once and who knows when what other birth will happen.

    Lord Buddha has even said that ‘the one who is to be born in the form of a human being, he also gives happiness to the deities.’

    According to the Bhagavad Gita, the ultimate aim of human life is to become a pure devotee of Krishna. Even those who practice Jnana Yoga or Ashtanga Yoga eventually understand this. Therefore, we should properly utilize our human life and engage in devotional service to Krishna without any material motive, as stated in the Bhagavad Gita. Karma Yoga is said to be the best in the Gita, even better than Sankhya or Bhakti Yoga. So do your work without attachment and desire for the fruit.

    “After many births and deaths, one who is truly in knowledge, knowing Me to be the cause of all causes, takes refuge in Me. Such a great soul is rare.”

    Bhagavad Gita 7.19

    The contemplation of Vedanta leads the rare human life towards excellence. The sutras of the Indian Vedas and Upanishads are relevant in every age. It is a proof of the glory of the great men of the country that even today the flow of good deeds continues.

    It has been said in Rigveda that we should also become great and make the whole world great.

    ..Yatha Dyoscha Prithivi Cha na Bibhito na Rishyatah. Ava me Prana Ma Vibhe: 1. – Atharvaveda.

    Meaning: Just as the sky and the earth are neither afraid nor destroyed, so is my soul! You too be free from fear.

    Where physical diseases arise from fear, mental diseases also arise and from this the feelings of suicide or mass murder have arisen. , A scared person never develops in any way. It is necessary to have boldness with restraint. Have fear only of God.

    The contemplation of Vedanta leads the rare human life towards excellence. The sutras of the Indian Vedas and Upanishads are relevant in every era. It is a proof of the glory of the great men of the country that even today the flow of good deeds continues.

    ..Yatha Dyoscha Prithivi Cha na Bibhito na Rishyatah. Ava me Prana Ma Vibhe: 1. – Atharvaveda.

    Meaning: Just as the sky and the earth are neither afraid nor destroyed, so is my soul! You too be free from fear.

    Where physical diseases arise from fear, mental diseases also arise and from this the feelings of suicide or mass murder have arisen. , A scared person never develops in any way. It is necessary to have boldness with restraint. Have fear only of God.

    According to Adi Jagadguru Shankaracharya, three graces are very rare, human body, mumuksha means hunger to get God and the third is the meeting of a great man. Out of this, the meeting of human body is the rarest. Gods and Goddesses also yearn to get it. Because only human life is based on knowledge and action. Gods also have knowledge, but they do not have the right to act. If we do not use the power of knowledge in the right direction, that is, for charity, then it will be misused.

    This human body is attained only by the grace of God. God’s pastimes are infinite, that’s why sometimes salvation is attained in other forms also by the grace of God, but the opportunity for salvation is with the human only.

    The body is not like a man. Dear for this bin.

    Bade Bhag Manush Tanu Pava. Sur rare, all books are not villages.

    In Vedic texts, a verse has been written for a person who commits suicide, which is as follows…

    Asurya name te loka blind tamasavrita. टास्ते प्रेट्याभिगच्छन्ति ये की चत्महनो जनाः।

    Means: After death, suicidal people go to the world called Asurya, full of ignorance and darkness, inferior to the light of the sun.

    According to the scriptures, the problems for which a person commits suicide can be solved if he is alive, but by committing suicide a life of endless suffering begins. They have to suffer the punishment for repeatedly breaking the rules made by God.

    Garuda Purana says that one has to bear the consequences of one’s deeds. Even if you try to escape from life, you cannot avoid them, but the consequences of suicide are more painful. Suicide cannot bring salvation in any way. In Vishnu Purana, Shri Krishna has given the knowledge to do spiritual practice for attaining salvation and not to commit suicide.

    Regarding what is the punishment for suicide, Garuda Purana says that the soul of the person who commits suicide hangs in limbo as a punishment. Suicide is reprehensible, because according to religion, one gets human life after many lives, in such a situation, it is foolish and a crime to waste it. That is why the life that happens after committing suicide is more painful.

    Lord Krishna gives the same message to Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita: Renounce attachment, stand up for action, leave attachment, have equanimity in happiness and sorrow, a person has the right in action, not in the fruit. This

    That is, be it Ramayana or Geeta, the establishment of religion and the destruction of demons is the main reason for God’s incarnation.

    Saint Tulsidas ji has said about the human body.

    “Bade bhaag manush tan pava, sur durlabh sad granthanhi gava.

    By doing Sadhna Dham Moksha, I did not get the hereafter.

    This human body is very important, because it is the instrument through which we can improve our hereafter, this human body is also the door to salvation. ,

    “Sadhaan Dham Moksha Kar Kar.”

    The context of “Ram Gita” is that after attaining human life, engaging in sensual desires is foolishness like taking poison instead of nectar, and no one says this is good, as-

    Nartanu Pai Bisay Man Dehi. When Sudha turned around, she took sixty poisons.

    That’s why sometimes I say that someone. Lost the echoes of the planets.

    Suicide (Latin suicidium, from sui caedere, meaning “to kill oneself”) is the act of intentionally causing one’s own death.

    We can achieve anything by doing work only through the human body. This human life is capable of giving everything:

    hell heaven apavarga niseni. Giving complete happiness without knowledge.

    Therefore it is proved that there is no body like a human being, which even the gods pray for.

    ′′ Male is not equal to female body.

    The one who does not decorate his other world even after getting this unfortunate human body, nothing happens in his fate except regret and he suffers.

    By doing Sadhan Dham Moksha. Don’t get where the other world is decorated.

    I got sorrow in my life, I bowed my head and repented.

    Since it is by the great grace of God that we get this human body-

    Why do you have mercy on the human body? Det eis binu het snehi.

    For this reason, to what extent it is wise to let this body indulge in sensual pleasures, even heaven is for a short time and in the end one has to suffer.

    Brother, this is not the subject of the fruit of the body. Heaven’s short end is sad.

    Suicide (Latin suicidium, from sui caedere, meaning “to kill oneself”) is the act of intentionally causing one’s own death. Suicide bombers and fidayeens are also included in this. Pakistan is the founder of fidayeens and suicide bombers.

    What kind of mother is this Pakistani terrorist! Congratulations on the killing of the terrorist’s son, you are brave. you are courageous May Allah give you Jannaht!

    Suicide, especially in the form of Fidayeen attacks, is a deeply concerning issue that has been plaguing many countries in recent years. Fidayeen, which translates to “one who sacrifices oneself,” is a term used to describe individuals who carry out suicide attacks as part of a larger terrorist operation.

    While the motivations behind Fidayeen attacks can be complex and multifaceted, it is important to remember that taking one’s own life is considered a sin in many religious traditions, including Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.

    In Christianity, suicide is generally considered a sin, as it is viewed as an act of despair and a rejection of God’s gift of life. The Catholic Church, for example, considers suicide to be a mortal sin, meaning that it is a deliberate and grave offense against God that could lead to eternal damnation. Other Christian denominations hold similar views, emphasizing the importance of valuing human life and seeking help and support in times of crisis.

    In Judaism, suicide is also viewed as a serious transgression, as it goes against the belief in the sanctity of life. The Talmud, a central text of Jewish law and tradition, teaches that taking one’s own life is equivalent to shedding blood, and is thus forbidden. This prohibition against suicide is also reflected in Jewish law, which emphasizes the importance of preserving life and seeking help in times of distress.

    It is important to note that these religious teachings do not simply condemn suicide as a sin, but also emphasize the value of life and the importance of seeking help and support in times of crisis. While the motivations behind Fidayeen attacks can be complex and multifaceted, it is crucial to remember that taking one’s own life is not a solution to any problem, but rather a tragedy that causes immense pain and suffering to those left behind.

    Furthermore, Fidayeen attacks are not just a sin against God, but also a horrific act of violence that causes harm to innocent individuals and communities. These attacks often target civilians and are carried out with the intention of creating fear and instability. They represent a complete disregard for the sanctity of life and the value of human dignity.

    In conclusion, suicide, especially in the form of Fidayeen attacks, is a sin and an insult to God in many religious traditions. It is important for individuals and communities to recognize the value of life and seek help and support in times of crisis, rather than resorting to violent and destructive actions. By doing so, we can work towards creating a more peaceful and just world for all.

    Mass murders also fall in this category. An example of mass suicide is the “Johnstown” cult suicide in 1978, in which 918 members of the Peoples Temple, an American cult led by the Jimjohns, ended their lives by ingesting grapefruit juice flavored with cyanide.

    More than 10,000 Japanese civilians committed suicide by jumping from “Suicide Peak” and “Banzai Peak” in the final days of the Saipan War..

  • पृथ्वी ग्रह जीवित है जैसे वृक्ष

    पृथ्वी ग्रह जीवित है जैसे वृक्ष

    वैश्विक प्रभाव पश्चिमी वाशिंगटन विश्वविद्यालय के जीवविज्ञानी डेविड हूपर की टीम ने 192 अध्ययनों की जांच की जिसमें प्रजातियों की समृद्धि और पारिस्थितिक तंत्र पर इसके प्रभाव को देखा गया। हूपर बताते हैं, “जैव विविधता के नुकसान के प्राथमिक चालक आज तक के प्रभाव के मोटे क्रम में हैं: निवास स्थान की हानि, अत्यधिक कटाई, आक्रामक प्रजातियां, प्रदूषण और जलवायु परिवर्तन।” शायद अस्वाभाविक रूप से, “21वीं सदी में जैव विविधता हानि पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र परिवर्तन के प्रमुख चालकों में से एक हो सकती है,”3 मई को नेचर । ( साइंटिफिक अमेरिकन नेचर पब्लिशिंग ग्रुप का हिस्सा है।)

    जगदीश चन्द्र बसु ने सिद्ध किया कि पेड़-पौधों में भी जीव है। पेपर प्रोडक्शन के लिए पर्यावरण के रक्षक हमारे जीवन के रक्षक  जंगल कै जंगल असंख्य पेड़ों की हत्या की जाती है।

    पृथ्वी प्रचुर मात्रा में जीवन से भरी है। सौर मंडल में, पृथ्वी जीवन का पर्याय हो सकती है, लेकिन क्या ग्रह स्वयं जीवित है? पृथ्वी ग्रह मनुष्य, बिज्जू, मच्छर, या यहाँ तक कि टमाटर के पौधे की तरह एक जीवित इकाई नहीं है, इस तथ्य ने लोगों को पूरे समय पृथ्वी को एक जीवित प्राणी की तरह मानने से नहीं रोका।

    पृथ्वी प्रचुर मात्रा में जीवन से भरी है। सौर मंडल में, पृथ्वी जीवन का पर्याय हो सकती है, लेकिन क्या ग्रह स्वयं जीवित है? पृथ्वी ग्रह मनुष्य, बिज्जू, मच्छर, या यहाँ तक कि टमाटर, आलू, मूली, संतरा आदि के पौधों की तरह एक जीवित इकाई नहीं है, इस तथ्य ने लोगों को पूरे समय पृथ्वी को एक जीवित प्राणी की।

    ,

    कई वैज्ञानिक अब यह मानने लगे हैं कि पृथ्वी और पृथ्वी पर जीवन समय के साथ-साथ इस तरह से विकसित हुए हैं कि प्रत्येक ने दूसरे को हर कदम पर प्रभावित किया है। पृथ्वी पर जीवन केवल पर्यावरण पर प्रतिक्रिया करने के बजाय, पृथ्वी पर जीवन भी अपने आसपास के वातावरण को प्रभावित करता है और बदलता है। पृथ्वी और पृथ्वी पर जीवन समय के साथ-साथ इस तरह से विकसित हुए हैं कि प्रत्येक ने दूसरे को हर कदम पर प्रभावित किया है। पृथ्वी पर जीवन केवल पर्यावरण पर प्रतिक्रिया करने के बजाय, पृथ्वी पर जीवन भी अपने आसपास के वातावरण को प्रभावित करता है और बदलता है। इस तरह से देखने पर, पृथ्वी को एक विशाल, जटिल प्रणाली के रूप में देखा जा सकता है जिसमें पर्यावरण और जीवित चीजें एक स्व-विनियमन संपूर्ण बनाने के लिए लगातार परस्पर क्रिया करती हैं ।